Quote:
Originally posted by Astrocloud
Whatever it is you are trying to say. You are not being very clear.
If there is an investigation on Bush for anything -It should be on the merits of the case... Not simply because Clinton was investigated for whitewater -and now it's Bush's 'turn'.
(P.S. That would make no sense for someone to argue that point. That is another fallacy called Ad Hominem Tu Quoque).
|
I'm not commenting on the practice of investigations or the merits of them, I'm simply saying that your singling out of the "right"ist strategy of pointing to Clinton when people criticize Bush applies to the "left" (or whoever) when they point out that there should be investigations of Bush (ties with Haliburton, the banner, etc) because there were investigations of Clinton.