Quote:
Originally posted by Pellaz
Rookie mistake there. This is the kind of question that movies like this avoid, because they don't really matter. If however you need some rationale, I propose one of the following.
1. She's probably covered with scars, and if the baby had died, they would of had to remove it through surgery.
2. Do you really think she's anything approaching what would be called 'sanity'?
3. I doubt it's a question that after reaching your initial conclusions about, you'd be eager to dwell on. Just like any normal woman, I'd say.
|
1. Good point. But if the baby had survived, they would have also removed it through surgery.
2. Maybe. But she seems to be able to think clearly.
3. Ummm, no! It's her kid. She looked like she was well into her pregnancy when she was almost killed, so it would seem that she would have developed a bond with her child in that time. If no one actually told her it was dead, why would she assume it? And why wouldn't she question any of her victims about it... especially "Buck who likes to Fuck?" He did work at the hostpital after all.
And I don't <i>need</i> any rationale, but I do think Tarantino should have offered some.