Quote:
Originally posted by Ustwo
Again, what you want to do is fine, but I don't think a homosexual home is a good place to bring up children. When you leave the gene pool, you sort of give up that right in my book.
|
Really. So, do you think that an orphanage would be a better place for a child to be raised, than with two loving homosexual parents? Would you prefer that the child be aborted rather than be born into a life with two homosexual parents? Feel free to make statements like you have above, as long as you don't pretend to be able to back them up with any facts.
Quote:
Originally posted by bonbonbox
The legal ramifications for being married is the government being in the marriage business. One can't logically use one to defend the other. Who cares who is with who and why is the question. I submit the answer lies in religion, which the government has no business legislating.
|
I agree that the government is the only thing keeping the government involved with marriage. Most major health-care providers offer "domestic partner" benefits, and the vast majority of the population gets its health care through their employer, which use said major health-care providers. As for taxes, simplify the tax code across the board and marriage will no longer need to be a factor in that either.