|
Identical twins
Say one of a pair of identical twins commits a murder and the only evidence is DNA, like a hair or something.
Now they have identical DNA, the evidence proves that one of them must have done it, and naturally they both deny everything.
What should (or could) a jury do?
This same problem could apply to just about anything, paternity suits etc.
__________________
If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always gotten
|