You know, I was just sitting around for a minute, when I realized, "wait a minute, this moron doesn't have a clue what he's talking about"
Quote:
Originally posted by eple
There has been no law suits.
THERE ARE NO EVIDENCE OF LIES, DECEPTION OR OTHERWISE FLAWED ARGUMENTATION IN BFC THAT WOULD COME THROUGH IN COURT.
Now if fox would sue Al Franken for satire, doesen't it seem weird that Moore has, according to some of you, lied outright to the american people and gotten away with it despite powerful corporate enemies.
|
Quote:
Directly from FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC, v. PENGUIN GROUP (USA), INC. and ALAN S. FRANKEN
Plaintiff Fox News Network, LLC ("Fox News" or "Plaintiff"), by its undersigned counsel, for its Complaint against defendants Penguin Group (USA), Inc. ("Penguin") and Alan S. Franken ("Franken") (collectively "Defendants") alleges as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief and damages. Fox News seeks relief against the defendants for trademark infringement and trademark dilution under federal and New York statutory law, and unfair competition under federal and New York statutory and common law.
|
See the word slander in there once? You're just like Michael Moore, making up things that don't exist. Want to read the rest?
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/i...in80703cmp.pdf
Read the entire complaint, it's about trademark infringement of "Fair and Balanced" not about slander. In fact, the word "slander" is not even in the complaint.
Thank god I wasn't fooled by your bs.
Now please, make up another baseless argument I can shoot down.