eple

"Boohooo Moore pulled the gun lobby's pants down, man are we pissed now. He wasn't right, you know, look, here's a grammatic error, and here is proof that one of the scenes might have been cut for dramatic effect."

Jesus, some of you need to listen to yourself blabbering. Moore makes his own case most brilliantly, and let me put attention to an important fact he pointed out:

There has been no law suits.

Why? is it because the NRA are too poor to sue? Maybe they have such high standards that they will only sue in extreme cases, even though someone is, as some people here say: blatantly lying to damage them. Or maybe there has been no lawsuits because:

THERE ARE NO EVIDENCE OF LIES, DECEPTION OR OTHERWISE FLAWED ARGUMENTATION IN BFC THAT WOULD COME THROUGH IN COURT.

Now if fox would sue Al Franken for satire, doesen't it seem weird that Moore has, according to some of you, lied outright to the american people and gotten away with it despite powerful corporate enemies.

Sorry guys, telling the same bs 200 times in a row won't make it true.