View Single Post
Old 08-11-2003, 11:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
collide
Turn off your TV.
 
Location: ... .- -. ..-. .-. .- -. -.-. .. ... -.-. --- --..-- -.-. .-
I can understand the need for sexual parity, but voting for a candidate based solely on her sex alone is as much of a mistake as voting for Arnie because he's a big, famous, charismatic Hollywood movie star. It's just not a notable characteristic I'd want to base my decision on.

Here's a partial list of women running for govenor in California:
http://www.marycareyforgovernor.com/
http://www.georgyforgov.com/
http://www.ariannaforgov.com/
http://www.audiebock.com/

complete list of candidates:
http://www.capwiz.com/sacbee/dbq/cagovcand/

Some (men and women) are more qualified than others, and the rest are just laughable.
__________________
"inhuman fiery goat worship" is an anagram for "information superhighway" -kingvolc
collide is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46