The name calling aside,
Napalm isn't a "chemical" weapon in the same sense as is generally meant when the military and government say "chemical" weapon.
Harmless, by your definition (any weapon containing chemicals is a "chemical" weapon), then ALL modern weapons beyond a bayonnette are chemical weapons, as bullets and bombs all use chemical reactions in their functioning.
There's a good reason when they say, "War is Hell".
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis
The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!
Please Donate!
|