View Single Post
Old 08-03-2003, 10:35 PM   #67 (permalink)
chavos
Banned
 
Location: St. Paul, MN
Quote:
Now, isn't it interesting that the same religions that supported the cessation of slave trade were also used to *support* that slave trade previously?
People used to think that the earth was the center of the universe. Is that mankind suddenly being stupid and being against science? No...it's part of the progess that human systems make. I don't expect science to have all the answers from day one...and the tradition of belief in progressive revelation makes it clear that religions don't expect that of themselves either. Pretty fair if you ask me.

Quote:
I said that religion, like extreme nationalism (Hitler) are authoritarian in nature. Godwin's law has nothing to do with it.
Quote:
You cite a time when governments killed, claim WITH OUT PROOF that religions are like that government
You still can't make the claim that religion is authoritarian. It's proof by anecdote. I could "prove" that all governments are authoritarian by your means...its not logically sound in the least.

Quote:
I said that religion, like extreme nationalism (Hitler) are authoritarian in nature.
Exactly...you assert religion is authoritarian, then mention that Nazi's are authoritarian. Wtf? There is no reason that this needs to get dragged in...nor can you prove that religion is by definition authoritarian. Even ONE non-authoritarian church would blow that statement right out of the water, and the relvenance of nazism to this debate right along with.

Quote:
Comparing the abstract concept of "Freedom" with the abstract concept of "God" in this instance is wrong, period. Freedom cannot be touched, but it's certainly real. Because it's an abstract concept, we cannot see it. God is simply not the same. Therefore, by *my* logic, freedom can be good, but believing in god is irrational.
Intresting how your rebuttal of my arguemnt consisted of no facts, but simply unproven assumptions and personal feelings. I'm not trying to be a dick, but i don't think you make a coherant case for why they are different at all. Many people would say they are much the same...and i think you will have a hard time proving them wrong.

Quote:
You did not "prove" anything. You claimed there were some religions that were non-authoritarian. Great. Okay, how's about this: The world's major religions, as in "organized religions", are authoritarian.
Its called counter example...i did prove something. But furthermore, i would say your revised assertion still suffers overbreath. Many churchs are authoritarian...i've suffered under a few such institutions...one of the reasons i went on church hiatus for so many years. But in striking contrast are many of the protestant churches, where there is no power structure beyond the individual community, and large numbers of church alternatives mean that there is little way for clergy to pressure their congregations with out them leaving for another church. Some cater to extremism, but many cater to progressives, and thinkers...and renouce the dangerous self rightiousness that you also decry. I've had much the same experience in visiting Reform synagagues...where community interaction is the core of religious understanding, not a top down decree from an all knowing source...i profess to have no experience visiting mosques, so i'll refrain from comment there. But point of the matter, personally i know your statement to be false....and i think you'd encounter much the same if you paid attention to the less visible liberal wings of the major monotheisms. The conservatives get the press...but they don't define the movement.

Quote:
Ah yes... some of the greatest minds on earth were send to prison for saying things that their religious leaders didn't like. Others were lucky enough to live in a time where organized religion lost most of it's political power.
Ditto if you replace "religion" with "governments". I won't tell you all politics is evil...or anti-intellectual.

Quote:
It may not *mean* it, but for the extremists, it's certainly the case. And that is exactly my point: religion *can* be abused; it allows itself to be abused, and it's very design facilitates abuse.
All power can be abused...any power can be abused. Why blame religion for a shortfalling that extends WAY past the boundaries of religious life?

Last edited by chavos; 08-03-2003 at 10:39 PM..
chavos is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360