Quote:
Originally posted by Lebell
Second, I agree with Chavos that Paper is wed to as literalistic an interpretation and reading of the Bible as ultra fundamentalist Christians are, and ultimately, this is a disservice to the book. This is simplistic in the least and ignores hundreds of years of Biblical scholarship and understanding.
|
The only way to debate the morality of the Bible is to debate it as is. When you provide your subjective interpretation of it, you're providing that part of the Bible thats been combined with your own sense of morality. I'm disinterested in debating *your* morality.