Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_
Whoa, whooaa, whoa there horsey. 
Let me get this straight...
If a political ally has commitment, that's a good thing, but if an opponent has commitment, that's a bad thing?
Please tell me that you're NOT reducing things to this level - I have more respect for you than that. |
No. I respect people with conviction regardless of ideology. I also respect debate regarding different approaches to achieve a common goal. It is very easy for me to work with those of different ideologies or with different approaches to for example over-come "evil".
---------- Post added at 04:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:50 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
And we're left with another aceism, I know ace, it's up to everyone else, and what they choose to do with it. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
|
I am not the one calling for a change in "tone". If that is your goal, it is up to you to act, isn't it? If it is not your goal, why have we been discussing this?
---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:53 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by yournamehere
Wow, you managed to quote me and misquote me within a few sentences.
So much for living in the real world.
I said she's an attention-whore. Not exactly the same meaning as "whore."
I never called her stupid or uncouth, either. I'll give you ignorant, though.
|
In responding to your post, I was also summarizing many comments from many posts and sources. My point was to illustrate the absurdity in the desire from some to change the "tone".