I used this example before and I will put more emphasis on it.
The Saddam Husein trial was a show trial.
There was absolutely no possibility that he was going to be found not guilty.
There was no possibility that he was ever going to be a free man.
Our government allowed the trial, because we knew these things.
The only point of the trial, was for the "show".
Yet, we play pretend here.
How about a Osama Bin Laden trial if he is captured, is there any possibility that we would allow him to not be convicted?
Would you have a trial for him? Why? Would you risk him walking the streets of NY a free man if he is found not guilty? Would you risk the message sent if a judge or a juror with an agenda cause an innocent verdict?
And it goes for some others - if all you see in the concept of "show trial" is Stalinistic justice, that is your limitation, not a problem with me.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."
Last edited by aceventura3; 11-19-2010 at 03:50 AM..
|