|
ill be honest, its been so long since ive looked at trusts, i dont recall what aussie law says about trusts.
if i recall correctly, family trusts were protected when it came to personal bankruptcy, but i dont remember about marital relationships...may be wrong.
According to this artcle, it seems that he's going to have access to some of that money, which leads me to believe that he'll get a chunk out of what she ends up with. $4K a week aint bad
my comment about the shoe being on the other foot was only really to say that the roles have been reversed. nothing more. i guess ive heard all the stories about men being screwed over in divorce and alimony settlements, i guess im not used to seeing it the other way around. if the law entitles him to it, i say good luck.
if i were him, id keep my waiting job and save as much as i could, but easy come, easy go. this money wont last by the sounds of it.
nice story daniel...she should have got a slap on the hand factored into the final settlement that reduced her final value to teach others not to screw with the system. she would have had to pay him in the end. that'd have had even more comical value.
__________________
An injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere
I always sign my facebook comments with ()()===========(}. Does that make me gay?
- Filthy
|