Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Dunedan
Nevermind. I'm done playing with you. You premesis are crap, your sources (the few that you've provided) are mostly irrelevant and (as has been pointed out by others as well) frequently contradict your own assertions. Your assertions themselves are unsupported by evidence, and when presented with evidence of your error your only rebuttal is to insist that "things have been changed by the evil lying Westerners" without offering any actual evidence of it becuase, of course, whatever evidence you -could- offer has been changed! This is an intellectually-dishonest method of debate for which I have no time.
Enjoy yourself, Br'ar Fox. Br'ar Rabbit gon' back to te Briar Patch.
|
What you're displaying is a typical attitude of those who want to carry on the 'sexual segregation' of males at all cost (and its almost always someone who closely relates with the 'gay' identity, although, I suspect some males who lack natural masuclinity and are dependant on heterosexuality for their 'straight' status, may also have a strong stake in the 'sexual orientation' concept replacing the original 'manhood' concept).
1. First you attack my assertions vehemently.
2. Then you try to belittle the issue by saying this is somehow my personal issue, and the reason why I am raising it here is entirely personal.
3. Then you ask for evidences.
4. When provided by evidences you repeatedly try to ignore them. You try to hide behind what the mainstream western academic and scientific institution propagate.
5. When specifically proven wrong over an issue, and repeatedly so, you leave all of a sudden. But not gracefully after accepting defeat, but only after levelling all kinds of accusations.