Quote:
Originally posted by SecretMethod70
Loki, while I understand your logic, I don't understand how it is any less reasonable than the logic that, had they actually destroyed the weapons, they would have shown the proof to us.
"a little dose of anthrax could have evened the ods in the war."
so could a little proof of destruction.
No, I think we're exactly in the situation Saddam wanted us to end up in - he knew he couldn't win through military might so, as usual, why not manipulate the court of world opinion and make Iraq out to be a victim.
|
it didnt bother him that he lost all his power as long as he manipulated world opinion?
a dictator's #1 priority is maintaining/increasing power and he/she would go to great distances to do this.