Quote:
Originally Posted by dlish
so tiger woods has been allededly been busted having an affair with an aussie mistress Rachel Uchitel (damn those hot aussie girls!, and after seeing the video do you blame him..gee whiz). both deny the story, but tiger hasnt really done himself any favours by turning down interviews with the cops.
is it really a big deal? should the world richest sportsman be left alone to sort out a domestic issue with his wife? or is he the property of the media/world and hence fodder because he's a public persona?
i expected the story to break here, but surprisingly it hasnt! here's the story for those that have been hibernating.
Pictures: Alleged Tiger Woods Mistress -- baltimoresun.com
ahh..aussie girls.. gotta love 'em
 |
Interesting, I love how there seems to be no shortage of video compilations of mistress pics, yet any "tribute"
video of his wife is taken down due to copyright infringement.
Isn't it just amazing what a good lawyer can do for you? It's probably just about as amazing as how much money Rachel Uchitel will reel in off this. Go Go Hollywood
That pretty much sums up my take on this. I first heard this on the CBC a few days ago when it appeared to be just an innocuous traffic incident. Having hibernated for a few days and now coming back to this story I find it absolutely hilarious. This will be a keystone for Daily Show/Colbert jokes for a long long time.
I simply don't see how privacy factors into the situation here. Here's a guy who lived his dream and made millions, living one of the most beautiful lives in the nation, really the only price I can see that came with that was a loss of privacy. It should go without saying that if some guy who's running around on his family gets caught red-handed should end up feeling ashamed. At least in Tiger's case he's got some huge wads of cash to turn to for alimony payments.