Quote:
Originally posted by SecretMethod70
So, it's not about upcoming elections, or the UN, or not caring about humanitarian needs. It's a matter of the lesser of two evils. We can work slowly at this - think Cold War II slowly - or we can have them fire nukes and other missiles at us, as well as possibly S Korea, Japan, and other countries on their bad side. Personally, living in Chicago, where they have missiles that can reach, I'd rather not wake up one day to hear antiquated cold war-era raid sirens.
|
Any way you look at it, Bush seems to have screwed up. North Korea certainly presents a much clearer threat than Iraq did-does ANYONE disagree with that?
No one but Bush can truly know his motives, but I certainly do want to know why he thought Iraq was more important to take out 'now' than North Korea is.
P.S. The talk about Syria and Iran, ridiculous IMO