there are the contexts that empirically obtain, like those in this actual case, and those which you mistakenly impute to it.
they're different.
and it's easy to check.
you might, for example, read the wiki page on the debate about corporate personhood i linked above and tell me where the strict construction line enters into it.
or you might look at the press blurb of the amicus brief:
http://www.clementsllc.com/home/What...rporations.pdf
all you have to do is look at the actual context and not rely on your ability to rip a few sentences out of context and impose whatever you like on them.