so wait.
you post a question about proof (why can't they prove ghosts)
you do not define the term, which is the verb in your own sentence fragment.
then you're pissy that folk talk about this obvious problem with your post.
what do you imagine philosophy to be?
do you imagine it as what you call those stoner Deep Thoughts that one remembers long enough to write down?
seems to me that if you had the first idea of how philosophy works, even in its barnes & noble bookshelf variant (which is mostly what this forum is) you'd not only not be surprised by the thread, but might even think of it as a success.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|