|
a judicial scholar looked at her record at the court of appeals. She was part of panels in 50 cases where minorities claimed discrimination. Of the 50, she accepted the discrimination claim 3 times, and all three times the decisions were unanimous and joined by a republican appointed judge. The idea that she is some sort of racist that uses her judgeship to promote a reverse-discrimination agenda is simply false.
She has been part of quite a few polemical decisions in her court, but none of them involved race. If those who oppose her will hang their hat on this one out of context quote, her nomination will be a cakewalk.
|