|
thanks for dodging my question, zenturian. perhaps you imagined that will's one-dimensional reponse covered what i was asking you. but you'd be wrong.
as for your "argument"--it's curious that santomeyer's legal work isn't relevant, don't you think?
perhaps i was mistaken in imagining that a supreme court nominee should be debated on the basis of what she might have actually done as a judge. strange to see that somehow it's not relevant here.
but seriously, why do you ask, zenturian? why is this important?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|