View Single Post
Old 12-30-2008, 05:19 AM   #5 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the position that seaver outlines above is close to the starting point--there is no objectivity---not even normatively--so i don't approach "the media" as if it somehow disappoints by failing to measure up to a fantasy standard. when you talk about "trust" or a violation of trust, you imply some disappointment. and when you make a unified Thing called "the media" which disappoints, you're basically applying an inverted objectivity standard---and arriving a a curiously facile position.

maybe a better formulation is do you approach information sources critically...

that said, i'll write sentences that go in the opposite direction. in general i find television--particularly american television--to be far more problematic than the written press.
general:
tv news substitutes an illusion of immediacy for context--"being there" instead of "being informed." infotainment--which i think a better word for it than "news"---is an advertising delivery system--routine stories are cut to more or less the same duration as advertising segments. this has always struck me as a strange choice.

particular: over the past 30 years or so, it seems to me that television news has been brought to its knees as an infotainment source. it has increasingly become a simple relay system for official opinion management strategies--you know "public diplomacy"---in part through unintended consequences of changes in how that information is gathered--sending a crew to press conferences that provide you with ready-framed factoids and broadcasting prepacking segments save the stations money.

since the thatcher regime in the uk--since the falklands war--infotainment concerning military action in particular has been entirely subsumed under propaganda. the use of press pools and cutting off of independent reporting to the greatest possible extent makes infotainment into an extension of marketing war.

i've mentioned this before i'm sure, but a couple years ago i attended a documentary film conference and had the chance to see d.a. pennebaker do a presentation about his work. in the course of that, he noted that folk misunderstand the nature of television--they confuse it with a visual medium--but in fact, it's a talk medium. a paradigmatic instance of this is american baseball coverage, which is radio coverage with images. the assumption seems to be that you, viewer, are too stupid to decipher what is happening in front of you---and that you require a faster rhythm to the tv experience otherwise you will wander off to make a sandwich or do something else thereby missing vital advertising. same applies to infotainment: think about the number of sequences you have seen that "cover" significant events that consist of watching a famous person entering or leaving a hotel---cameras positioned paparazzi style by entrances to hotels provide an illusion of contact with the immediate--but it's the voice over that tells you what you're "really seeing"--the net result of this is a passive relation to an illusory immediate.

from 9/12/2001 until sometime in 2006 i think, the american television apparatus across the board exploited this passivity to sell you first the "war on terror" then, famously, the war in iraq. it was able to do this because the television apparatus acquired a more or less unified political function through it's reliance on press conferences instead of reporting, through it's systematic preference for conservative talking heads in opinion management segments. every fascist order of the 20th century has relied on radio or television to structure consent. every fascist regime has relied on radio or television (in the american case of fascism-lite) to shift collective frames of reference, to set up an Enemy and legitimate actions against the Enemy. treated uncritically in a context where there is no meaningful diversity of viewpoints, these media can be not only unreliable, but dangerous.

want a striking example? think about the role radio played in the rwanda genocide.

the written press is preferable for information, but this too has to be read critically. a first step is not relying on the press from one country--particularly not the american press--as if it either reports situations accurately or, even less, interprets them in their complexity.

i guess the above is mostly about the virtual disappearance of independent reporting.

o yeah--i more or less stopped watching television for a long time--from 9/12/2001 through last january. it's easy. i'd check in on things, but in the main i didn't bother with it. since i've been watching again, i prefer reality shows to "news" figuring that television is mostly about itself and in "reality show" contexts that's at least explicit.

if my experience is any guie, taking a break and then looking at it again will enable you to do what a confederacy of dunces is out there.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360