View Single Post
Old 10-21-2008, 08:07 AM   #24 (permalink)
shakran
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
Sorry, I did not support the bail out plan. I think we should let some of the failing institutions fail. Then on the other hand I think the government is actually investing in assets that have value and assets that can actually generate a positive return on investment. This is different than "spreading the wealth around".
Yes. "Spreading the wealth around" removes the 99% of the money in the hands of 1% of the population concentration that, historically, has always led to the downfall of civilizations. Considering that a great deal of that wealth was sucked out of the rest of the country through tax loopholes and shady business practices, I have no problem with it.


Quote:
I am guessing your beliefs are different than mine but your lifestyle and amount of "pollutants" you create are about the same as me.
Without knowing how many pollutants you create, I can't know. I will say that none of my cars gets less than 29mpg, and my home's electricity is supplemented with solar. I'd have wind, too, but the dumbshit neighbors won't sign off on it because they think a wind turbine will give them cancer. Literally.


Quote:
I expect adults to understand the consequences of their actions. What are the costs of Obama's environmental plans? You don't know do you? Do you think Obama knows? Do you think he will tell us?
The economic costs are that factories and power plants and other CO2 emitters will have to reduce their emissions (by 2050, I might add - it's not like they'll be stymied by February). This means they'll have to find new and, yes, probably expensive (at first) solutions to keep doing what they want to do, without destroying the environment.

The same hysterical "oh my god it'll ruin EVERYTHING" crap happened when the government mandated a switch from tetra ethyl lead-infused gasoline and.. . hey, look, we're still here, and not spewing millions of tons of neurotoxins into the air from our tailpipes every year.



Quote:
Our environment is not "fucked up". Our environment is cleaner today than it was 40 years ago. How do you define "fucked up"?
Global. Warming.




Quote:
Irreversible? I wonder if the scientist you did that study put into perspective the entire history of this planet? We are nowhere near the climate extremes this planet has existed through.
And during those climate extremes, humans weren't around. And if they had been, they'd have been killed off. I have no fear or doubt that the earth can survive without us, but the reverse is not true.
shakran is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360