Did you misquote the original source? I don't see where it said "if you replace the bulbs for a year" -- I presumed it was counting for the lifetime of the bulb, not over the year.
The over the year qualified the car emissions.
That is why I generated a number that was 20 times greater than the car emissions, leaving lots of room for a miscalculation.
In short, there are somewhat reasonable assumptions that make the claim accurate. And given the vague wording of it, saying that it is ridiculous in that case seems... disingenuous.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
|