Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I know... my views have been baseless, without merit, no facts, etc, etc...told you it was a discussion stopper.
|
No ace...I have never said that.
I have probably said that I think your view or position on a particular issue is wrong
IMO but I
have never suggested that you a liar or ignorant.
I have repeatedly said there are two sides (or more) to most policy issues and that
we will just have to agree to disagree.
You cant seem to accept that it is ok to agree to disagree...so yes, it is a discussion stopper.
Isnt that what the democratic process and elections are supposed to be all about.....candidates offer their positions and qualifications and the voters chose to agree or disagree. The "Rove' strategy which seems to have become the Republican strategy of choice (not just for McCain, but congressional candidates as well) is not to ask the voters to "agree or disagree" with their positions and qualifications, but to attack and disparage the opposing candidate and supporters who disagree.
-----Added 15/10/2008 at 05 : 48 : 47-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
dc, i love the way you articulated those points...but i'm wondering why this took an additional 4 yrs of bush..
|
I would attribute it, in part, to Kerry running the worst campaign in my memory.....until now. McCain has surpassed Kerry in ineptness, poor judgement, and an unfathomable lack of focus and coherent message.....other than negative.
Not qualities I want to see in a president.