Quote:
Originally posted by JadziaDax
There are other women who are of the same religion who are also veiled, yet there are no problems with them having their pictures taken for a driver's license or passport (or any other forms of ID).
|
Maybe they're not as pious
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc690/cc690967aeee6262751214bb97f6d99f62e16dc8" alt="Wink"
I was thinking mostly along the lines she just wants to be a bitch ... or has an authority problem or something.
Quote:
Originally posted by SecretMethod70
n the US a driver's license is the primary form of identification for everything, so it does a lot more than just say "this person passed a driver's test."
|
Just because it's used for identification doesn't mean that it is intended for that use. The licence needs to prove that you can drive, the fact that it's convenient to use it for other things is a side issue.
4thTimeLucky, if we're talking about a hypothetical case where someone had a religion which said "Thou shalt not be photographed" I agree that the state should allow separate forms of identification
within reason. I don't think either signature, birth certificate or fingerprints are good enough though.