How could you support her in an action that you believe is morally reprehensible? I could understand refusing to intervene, especially since doing so would be illegal, but there's a big difference between support and neutrality.
As far as your Russian roulette analogy, consider this: every time you get behind the wheel of a car, you're risking someone's life for the payoff of getting somewhere quickly. There's the possibility that, through your own inattention, or some other fault of yours, that you'll cause someone else's death. Is this acceptable? If so, at what leve of risk does it become unacceptable?
__________________
And you believe Bush and the liberals and divorced parents and gays and blacks and the Christian right and fossil fuels and Xbox are all to blame, meanwhile you yourselves create an ad where your kid hits you in the head with a baseball and you don't understand the message that the problem is you.
|