|
Sometimes I sit and wonder if I could be wrong in my view of things. I don't know how the other side can be so positive about things I am sure in my heart are wrong. I think about going over to the other side, just to see what it's like. Then I see that the other side doesn't seem to talk much about its mistakes, rather using misdirection or often simple silence to answer difficult questions. View reconmike here. His answer to "why didn't Saddam use WsMD?" was "Saddam is dead, guess we'll never know." Seretogis took a fair crack at it, but I think Dude answered that response pretty well. It's not as if a nuke would kill Saddam any more than a conventional weapon. All it would do is kill more innocent civilians and make the area uninhabitable for thousands of years. In fact, I would think Saddam, facing the end, would want to stab at us from hell's heart and provoke the US into a nuclear strike, an act that would earn us the condemnation of the entire world.
__________________
it's quiet in here
|