I was responding to post 63: "That frame of reference has to be an agreement that the official story is not the most likely explanation, then we can move on to what is the most likely explanation." My apologies for taking it out of context. Most conspiracy threads do just that.
My belief is that the typical layman hasn't the access or the skill set to do building failure analysis, though many, many attempt to do just that. My personal assessment of the whole thing is probability-based.
|