If the family member is an adult, then yes. Rodger Clinton ok.... Chelsea NO. Billy Carter ok.... Amy NO. Biden's adult sons, McCain's wife, ok..... Obama's kids, Palin's kids NO.
Oh wait..... Biden's sons aren't getting any coverage on the news networks or front pages....... THEY ARE EMBROILED IN ALL KINDS OF SCANDALS BUT Palin's pregnant 17 yr old daughter and Down's syndrome baby is.
THIS IS NOT THE PARTY I LOVED AND SUPPORTED FOR MY ADULT LIFE.
It was the GOP that was supposed to be uncaring, cold, grinding out dirt trying to win by destroying their opponent.
IF THIS CONTINUES..... I WILL NEVER SUPPORT A DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE AGAIN. THIS IS FUCKING PATHETIC AND YOU WHO SUPPORT THIS ARE SHAMEFUL.
-----Added 2/9/2008 at 01 : 47 : 44-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poppinjay
Even with Palin's anti-abortion pro-chastity stance, the whole Bristol issue should maybe have been off limits. Where I think it tripped up was when attendees at the convention, and Palin's own statement talked about how wonderful it was to add to the family and that Bristol would have to "grow up" much faster.
Because, don't you know, unwed teen mothers are the Solomons of our age.
I think a much smarter reponse would have been, "we love her, it's a family issue, thank you."
Not, "Jamie Lynn Spears has had to face this....."
|
Maybe just maybe, that was a statement from a mother in the public eye saying she loved her daughter unconditionally and supported her and that her daughter may have made a mistake BUT that the baby would be loved and welcomed.
Maybe she wanted it public because the she knew the fucking left winged news like CNN, ABC,CBS, NBC and so on would use it to try to hurt not only the ticket but her family. Maybe she watched the news read the papers and knew the attacks were coming so she wanted to make a public statement that she supported her daughter.
THAT JUST MAYBE WHAT WAS MEANT.
This woman shows more strength and I admire her bravery and honesty.