View Single Post
Old 07-30-2008, 04:37 PM   #114 (permalink)
jewels
Eponymous
 
jewels's Avatar
 
Location: Central Central Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by sound chaser View Post
i know i might get flamed for this, but what they hey i'm big enough to handle it..

i don't think the ownership of child porn should be illegal. but the production of it should be. simply looking at child porn in itself does not violate a child's legal rights. i can't see anywhere in the US Bill of Rights (if we're using the USA as an example) that merely viewing child porn is outlawed.
No flame, but can you really rationalize that?
Ownership condones the act of production. Without a market of viewers, there would be no reason to produce it.
__________________
We are always more anxious to be distinguished for a talent which we do not possess, than to be praised for the fifteen which we do possess.
Mark Twain
jewels is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73