View Single Post
Old 07-14-2008, 12:43 PM   #57 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Why not answer a question? Why do you think Saddam engaged Israel in the 1991 Persian Gulf war? Israel was not a part of the coalition, nor did Israel have anything to do with Saddam's alleged dispute with Kuwait. I believe his intent was to get Israel involved in the conflict to then develop an anti-Israel coalition of his own, which could have tripped the region into chaos leading to world war. People who are willing to act in such a manner are a threat to every peace loving human on the planet, including you. Here is a link, for what good it will do.
You mean the link in which Iraq didn't launch any missiles? The link to a wiki page that quotes an Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister in essentially saying "yeah, we'd attack Israel if anything happened" and when it did happen Iraq launched no missiles at Israel? Wow that's really defiant! It's also very much a bark being much louder than a bite.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
After ignoring the above point, you can ignore this one:
Don't act like a child.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
When Saddam was faced with certain defeat, why do you think he employed a slash and burn strategy of Kuwait's oil infrastructure?
Don't you read my posts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel, again
After the US back stabbed Iraq, Saddam realized that the US was trying to weaken Iraq so that the US could move in and steal the oil that Saddam thought he was going to get FROM Kuwait. He was understandably pissed and decided that his back stabbling ally wasn't going to best him. It was a move of ego and desperation, sure, but does that mean he was dangerous in 2003? Of course not. Not even a little.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Wouldn't a reasonable peaceful leader under the circumstances he faced, simply accept defeat and accept the determination of the UN and the "world" consensus against his act of aggression?
There is no such thing as a peaceful leader in war. Any illusions otherwise are naive. Do you think Bush was peaceful in invading Iraq? Do you even think Reagen was peaceful when he ordered the invasion of Grenada?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
You would trust a guy displaying these forms of defiance, and accept him as nonthreatening to peace and stability?
Trust has nothing at all to do with it. Why fear an angry dog with no teeth and no claws?
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360