View Single Post
Old 06-25-2008, 05:49 PM   #35 (permalink)
ASU2003
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jinn
"Bad boys" just brag about it more. "Nice guys" who play it well can be just as reproductively successful as bad boys, but one of the tenets of the 'nice guy' reproductive strategy is that you're not allowed to boast about it.

They both have the potential to be incredibly successful in terms of reproductive success, its just that 'nice guys' are unable to boast about it as loudly or as as proudly as 'bad guys'. The flipside is that the 'nice guys' get to whine about the 'bad boys'.

So for men who want to be able to whine but not brag, 'nice guys' is the way to go, but for men who like to brag but not whine, 'bad guy' is the way to go.
I'm not a big fan of the nice vs bad labels. But I would use the polygamous vs monogamous one. (Even though you can't guarantee that the monogamous ones won't cheat...) And it seems like there is no problems (except increased risk of STDs) if females sleep with a guy who has had previous female partners, even if it is just a one time thing. She can tell that he has some good physical qualities and may not even care to want to settle down and start a family with this 'bad' boy. It does satisfy her urge to reproduce and that guy is willing to be flashy and advertise that he wants sex. The guy is content with getting different girls, even though a few or many other guys have been with them.

I wonder if they marked this image with the colors dark blue for those guys that thought they were bad and light blue for those that thought they were good (and include the abstinent ones in it), what they would find:
http://www.livescience.com/php/multi...ne+high+school.

It is a study that needs to be more in-depth and look at a lot of different cities, economic levels, education levels, race and parents to really make it better. But, if you go down to your local 20-something bar, it is evident that it is happening there. I would also like to see the researchers take a look at the effect of birth control and feminist attitudes that "I don't need a man" and how that effects things. When you don't need a man in your life to raise a family, what good is having a kid with the short fat guy when she could pick the 6'7" guy who goes to bed with a different girl every night?
ASU2003 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360