|
I don't think Xeph disputed the fact that it can be considered a science, especially with a definition of science like the one from your essay:
"1. systematized knowledge derived from observation, study, etc. 2. a branch of knowledge, esp. one that systematizes facts, principles, and methods 3. skill or technique"
He simply claimed that the systematized knowledge as of yet is lacking. That there is still a lot of "bunk" or empty talk.
In this sense, phrenology too, is a science.
__________________
Moderation should be moderately moderated.
|