Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - Does Federer have to beat Rafa in his prime at Roland Garros to be the best ever?

Strange Famous · 06-09-2008, 10:20 AM

Lendl and Connor I wouldnt even place in the same league as Federer. You could make an argument maybe for Borg.

Tennis is so hard to judge across periods because of the differences in equipment though.

If you hit the ball on the forehand like Rafa Nadal does it would break your arm.

===========

Edit

Seriously, do you think McEnroe could take even a set of Federer at Wimbledon, in his prime, any time in thel ast 3 years?

Could Lendl have taken the French Open in a final against Nadal?

06-09-2008, 10:20 AM	#10 (permalink)
Strange Famous follower of the child's crusade?	Lendl and Connor I wouldnt even place in the same league as Federer. You could make an argument maybe for Borg. Tennis is so hard to judge across periods because of the differences in equipment though. If you hit the ball on the forehand like Rafa Nadal does it would break your arm. =========== Edit Seriously, do you think McEnroe could take even a set of Federer at Wimbledon, in his prime, any time in thel ast 3 years? Could Lendl have taken the French Open in a final against Nadal? __________________ "Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate, for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain without being uncovered." The Gospel of Thomas Last edited by Strange Famous; 06-14-2008 at 02:24 PM..