Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
will, couldn't the context have been about responding to some open aggression? The response would be part of his constitutional duties.
|
He was being intentionally overtly aggressive to pander to dumb people who think we're always in danger. Normally, he would explain that it's bad policy to shoot first and ask questions later, especially unilaterally (as unilateral action usually means that none of our allies agree with us, as with Iraq).