View Single Post
Old 05-05-2008, 07:26 PM   #100 (permalink)
JEQuidam
Upright
 
JEQuidam's Avatar
 
Location: Dunwoody, Georgia
A firm schedule...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakk
On the other hand, I don't agree with JEQuidam. Such a change at this point would be disasterous, simply due to the raw magnitude of the change.
Yakk, I greatly appreciate all of your comments.

I have actually never discussed the transition. I believe that this will be implemented over two or three decades. For example, the 2020 apportionment would increase the size of the House to 3,000; then to 6,000 in 2030; and then achieve 1:50,000 by 2040.

OK, that's hypothetical, but I agree that the transition to a truly representative House should not be implemented too rapidly. The important thing is that this be implemented, without equivocation, according to a firm schedule which is not subject to subsequent political shenanigans.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
With 50,000 as the number you have 9 states that if voting as a bloc will create a majority.
Cynthetiq, States voting as a block??? That is a phoney argument. It's extremely unlikely that all the Representatives within any single state will ever vote as a block, let alone across a "block" of states. The representaties will be urban, rural, industrial, conservative, liberal, libertarian, green, etc., etc.,
__________________
It was supposed to be our House.

Last edited by JEQuidam; 05-05-2008 at 07:35 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
JEQuidam is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54