Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I think that it's assumed that guns are one of if not the most efficient weapons available. Remove such an efficient weapon, and the ability to kill decreases. I mentioned this elsewhere, but can you imagine Columbine with knives and swords instead of guns? They likely would not even have even attempted it. I can't tell you how difficult a drive-by would be without guns.
Those same psychos will be less able to hurt people without having a gun.
|
I can imagine the really gruesome deaths that would have occurred had those two maniacs had long swords. Can you imagine being stabbed with a 3 foot blade?
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistedmosaic
I live in phoenix, so I'm really getting a kick out of these replies.
I see someone exercising their right to open carry (Ie, a holster on your belt) at least once a week, which is legal to do without any permits at all...while they're on motorcycles or in restaurants/stores/parks. Never bothered me any. It always makes me chuckle to think the kind of reaction that would get in other parts of the country.
|
I can't wait to move to phoenix. 
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
Last edited by dksuddeth; 04-16-2008 at 02:18 PM..
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|