Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
Umm, are you making this up? Because lots of folks have NO problem with the wording of the second in terms of modern society when you consider that the militia is defined as including ALL men in the irregular militia.
|
In fact, the federal appellate courts have been split on the "individual" vs "collective" rights interpretation with more leaning towards the 2nd amendment providing a collective right of the "state" to arm its militia or at best, a limited right of indiviuals to bear arms as active members of the "state" militia.