Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
The difference between Bush and myself is that he is out to take your freedom and feeds you bullshit doing it. I'm trying to help you keep your freedom and showing you the truth and reasons why.
Hell will, just listening to Bush blather and get away with it should be enough reason for ALL people to want to ensure we have guns.
|
Well first off if Bush threatened me, I'd probably just laugh. I don't need a gun to defend myself from a retarded person. Even if he hauled me off to Gitmo, I get along really well with military people (just ask Crompsin).
/kidding
The point I'm trying desperately to make is that your message is riddled with the same bizarre language. "...can't handle freedom"? I mean you can't possibly think that makes sense. Yes, I realize that you and Bush don't have the same agenda, but you seem to be using similar language. Doesn't that make you think at all? I mean, could you stop? I don't think there's anyone who "can't handle freedom", because you're using too broad a definition of freedom. If you would have said, "people can't handle the freedom of having a lot of guns in the hands of the public", that might have made more sense, though even then the use of freedom isn't quite right.
Can you just say what you mean without making these grandiose, dksuddeth vs. the freedom-haters soap box proclamations? I've had gun debates with other members (longbough comes to mind) where neither party resorts to Bushisms. They tend to go well.