Originally Posted by host

My point was, that in a high profile criminal investigation, and arrest of the VP of the US's Chief of Staff, a case where it was possible to know the charges and the contents of the prosecutor's motions to the court, along with the defense motions, a case of very serious import, where it was possible to know almost as much as there was possible to know, you were completely dismissive towards authority.....towards the prosecution, the charges, the FBI investigation, and to an extent, even to the crime itself, yet in the case described by Herk,

I'll leave it to you and others to decide if your reaction was to give authority the benefit of the doubt, right out of the gate, with so little detail actually disclosed. I don't mean to go OT here, but I cannot understand your reaction here, or in the Libby criminal case.