Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Strange Famous
Anyone who is skilled in combat (as a top UFC brawler must be) would have the opportunity to box, to fight in the supreme test of masculinity under the Queensbury Rules. To fight in a sport that does not allow an attack on a defenceless opponent.
|
I find this statement funny, so the supreme test of masculinity is to bite an opponents ear? You don't seem to acknowledge the faults of people within your own sport and their tendencies to act like hooligans and thugs both inside and outside the ring.
Why is boxing the supreme test of masculinity, and who decided this? Why does the supreme test of masculinity have to involve fighting, why can't it be about who's the best underwater basket weaver?
MMA doesn't allow attacks on defenceless opponents, at least watch the sport before badmouthing it.