Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
Explain to me how it's laudable to be a pedophile apologist when all reputable scientific and medical evidence contradict his positions. I'm not sure if he's sticking to morally indefensible positions because of his actual beliefs or simply because of a love of arguing.
|
This was exactly my thought when I read that post. I'd be quite interested to hear where it's coming from. I don't think we've attacked HIM personally, but rather some fairly extreme assertions he's made with our own experiences and research which contradict those assertions. What "modern orthodoxy" are we upholding?