Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
No, I'm stating that [if] your argument is true, then the converse must equally be true. It also applies to them as well.
|
I'm sure every scientist has biases, but you're requiring us to believe that all the science academies and the IPCC (hundreds of scientists) and 99% of active climate science laboratories across the globe for the last 20 years all independently happen to have the
same bias. Probably pointless to ask, but, do you have any evidence? Was there a meeting I missed?
The bottom line is that all lines of scientific evidence are in agreement and converging on the same conclusion. Ice cores, stable isotopes, reconstruction of past climate, controlled physical experiment, monitoring of plant communities, of snow/ice cover, of extreme events, of global and regional temperatures, of ocean currents and temperatures, of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, models based on physics, etc. are all telling us the same story. That's what "consensus" means, and that's where there is no symmetry between the two sides.
If you disagree, then feel free to bring up a line of scientific evidence that contradicts the consensus.