Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Jeez. I do see a difference between men and women so far as rape, because of the ability of a man to overpower a woman physically, and that has created a long history of that type of violence. There isn't a huge and very well known history of rape against men by women. Not only that, but many men have a different take on sexuality than women. For example, I can see some guys waking up and smiling to the above situation. I can't see a woman waking up smiling to it, at least not in equal numbers. It may have something to do with women often being in charge of 'who gets laid tonight' as opposed to men. It's that difference that really brought me to start this thread.
|
While on average, men aare physically stronger than women, son't assume it is true in ALL cases. A large, athletic woman may certainly be more powerful than a small, non-athletic man.
I think most would a agree that a man could be anally raped with a strap-on or other object, or could be forced at knife-or gun point to have oral sex with a woman, so we'l just talk about forced penis-vagina sex. The fact that a man has to be erect for vaginal sex would raise significant doubt in any jury being asked to believe that a man did not consent to having sex. I would think that a married man who firmly didn't want to cheat would likey not have an erection if a powerful woman were trying to get his penis into her - but not having been in that situation, I'm not sure.
Even describing that situation I'm thinking "Yeah, right!" Women who want sex hard enough can usually manage to seduce someone, even if they're not very attractive. And that is consensual and not rape.
This is why rape cases against women accused of raping adult men are very rare, if they happen at all.