|
so how is that different in any other rape/sexual battery trial. are the word-other-than-victims preventing from saying that they were word-other-than-raped before the trial is completed? if it's her testimony, then i think she should be able to give it in her words. if the court determines she intentionally lied to distort meaning, then she gets found guilty of perjury. otherwise, what's the point of her testifying? why not have someone else listen to her testify, interpret it into acceptable language, and then give an emotionally fitting interpretative reading to the court? maybe with mood music and lighting? and perhaps a smashing dance score?
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
|