|
There's such a big difference though, a sort of ambiguity. I think I can judge the situation fairly well, but then again who am I to impose judgement, anyway here goes:
I've been fat, I've been bodybuilder large and I've been hypercut. Right now I'm normal looking, with just a tad more muscle than most men you see and I'm not particularly cut either anyway, I've got a healthy layer of fat covering my body. In my experience the way I look now is 100% the most attractive to most women.
The bodybuilder type worked great in clubs on women with a lower rank in society (sorry to be blunt, but social stratification is a fact). The hypercut look attracted VERY shallow, albeit stunning women. The way I look now attracts pretty much any woman. I'm past thinking about it in physical terms, if I can't win a woman over (mainly) because of who I am, instead of what body I am in, I don't even bother anymore, they don't deserve me.
The ambiguity I was talking about is this: in my experience, girls/women go gaga and all shaky-legs over Brad Pitts and whatnot when they see those guys on screen, but in real life they tend to go for more "normal" looking guys.
|