* Rotten Tomatoes : 84%
* James Berardinelli : 81%
* Peter Travers : 80%
* Roger Ebert : 77%
I really feel like that test, though intriguing conceptually, has far too few movies, far too few critics and far too movies that received mixed critical reactions. For the vast majority of movies on that list, it was pretty easy to guess where critics would put it. Furthermore, Rotten Tomatoes is already a compilation of critical reviews, which makes it sort of meaningless barometer for which critic you are most like. It essentially tells you if you agree with the average nationwide assessment of critics, which is-to me-less interesting than knowing that I agree with a specific critic. In other words, a neat idea and an interesting thought. Any of you out there have more time than me to put some more polish on it?
