Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Okay, then. Since you're so smart and we're all so stupid, and since you understand the founders so much better than anyone else (regardless of how completely irrelevant that is), then I have a question for you.
How should it be?
I don't think you can deny that the way driving is treated is as a privilege that is regulated by the several states. Let's say I stipulate that that's a violation of my God Given Right to Drive (we'll fiat an 11th Commandment: Thou Shalt Drive). How would you like it to be? How would you manage it? Who should get to drive? At what age? Should there be any case where they should be removed from their car?
|
Why limit it to 2D space? Why can't I fly a plane? Why do I have to deal with all that security at the airports when I could just buy a plane and fly myself? That same idea should apply to planes as well, since the constitutions I pointed out use roads and highways, so there is a basis of property to attach some sort of privilige or rights to. Airborne traffic has no "highways" in the same sense.
Dk, I've still provided you HOW they are able to regulate and restrict who drives. So now that I've pointed it out. You still ignore the WHAT is your point about it. It's been shown that it EXISTS in a state constitution. So now what?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Last edited by Cynthetiq; 06-20-2007 at 07:37 PM..
|