|
There are many dangerous aspects of a free society. We as a population intent on protecting these freedoms must do so through intelligent compromise in most cases. Absolute freedom in any large group becomes unworkable,and counter-productive to the whole, thus a certain level of limited freedom becomes justified. We call these limitations Law, and though no Law makes sense to every member of the citizenry, they are extremely important to the health of any society.
Traffic Laws and Gun control serve a similar purpose as a general rule. By forbidding people to run a red light we can minimize the inevitable accident and lower the chance of bodily injury without taking away the right to drive. Similarly, by placing limits on armament types we as a society minimize the possible damage a weapon can do within the society in question. For this reason no one can legally own an RPG for self defense, but can certainly carry a 9mm for protection if they feel so inclined.
If someone feels the need to own an assault rifle to protect themselves from perceived threat, I admit confusion as to how this weapon would be more effective for the purpose of protection unless the intent is to hold off an invasion of the home. Often the argument is one of sport shooting, and though I have no issue with the idea, I would expect the weapons involved to be regulated for the protection of society in general. You can have your High Powered Guns if you want them.....But don't expect me to trust you with my family.
|